CEOExpress Blogger Private Label
 CEOExpress Home


 Total visits to this poll: 10693

This icon appears on your homepage
when there are new posts.

      Search Messages:           
 
AllThis Forum

Do you think it's more effective to be for or against something or someone?

For
Against
Something else ó what?



Forum View Preference: Basic | AdvancedOpen Forums/Previous Polls | Suggest a Poll
See All Messages

1-32 of 32

1. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 3:48:53 PM)
     Message ID #296072

Back To All Messages
Actually, some of us donít choose sources on whether or not we ďlikeĒ the source. The credibility of a source to some of us is more dependent on their access to information than their likeability. Clearly, Bannon was at the top of the trump administration and had access to nearly everything that happened. Therefore, he has credibility. The trump administration is not likeable. It has been a rabid ratís nest from the beginning, but, again, Bannonís credibility is more important than whether or not he is liked.

2. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 4:14:53 PM)
     Message ID #296073

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296072 )  Back To All Messages

You are grasping at smoke.

Bannon, like you, knows squat.

His credibility is right up there with yours - zero.

Nice try.

God, you guys are pathetic.

Message edited by user at 1/3/2018 4:15:56 PM

3. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 4:05:14 PM)
     Message ID #296074

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296073 )  Back To All Messages

Bs, you are better when you just post emojis because they cover up your ignorance. Bannon was trump's left arm. trump appointed him to the NSC. You look at all the early pictures of staff in the oval office and he was there.
The interesting thing is that trump created this mess. He has no loyalty for anyone but his family. He loves to have interstaff bickering, because it limits their power. Can you imagine what is going to happen when Mueller begins to really squeeze the WH staff? I can, and can hardly wait. Lock them up! Lock them all up!

4. Tams Bixby CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 4:29:48 PM)
     Message ID #296075

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296073 )  Back To All Messages

Pot ... Kettle

5. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 4:28:49 PM)
     Message ID #296077

This message is in response to Tams Bixby ( message id #296075 )  Back To All Messages


6. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 4:14:42 PM)
     Message ID #296076

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296072 )  Back To All Messages

Something is up, Manafort just filed a Civil Lawsuit against Mueller & Rosenstein for violating his rights, overstepping their bounds

diversion? testing the waters?

He might have a case.....

7. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 4:11:45 PM)
     Message ID #296078

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296076 )  Back To All Messages

In our country anybody can sue anybody else for anything. Regardless, Mueller has been doubling down and working with state AG's to prevent the little hands guy from pardoning witnesses before they are called to testify in court. If you are pinning your hopes on this, your s*** is very, very weak, Thomas.
Mueller is the consummate professional. Manafort is a crook.

8. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 7:56:10 PM)
     Message ID #296080

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296078 )  Back To All Messages

Something's up, they are all in cahoots....

How do you know that? More leaks? "unnamed sources"

A civil lawsuit is public record, if a judge allows it, the others will follow, and then Mueller will be tied up in court. Try to follow the bouncing ball D.

9. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 4:37:54 PM)
     Message ID #296083

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296080 )  Back To All Messages

Granted, trump needs a miracle to save him, but he had better hope for more than Manafort's desperate suit to save his bacon. Personally, I hope the testimony concerning Fusion GPS's dossier on trump is released. That might be even more damning than Bannon's book. Talk about a house of cards!
Lock them up! Lock them all up!

Message edited by user at 1/3/2018 4:39:06 PM

10. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 4:34:49 PM)
     Message ID #296086

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296083 )  Back To All Messages

Interesting, you think the release of the Fusion GPS dossier would be a good thing. A document that has been discredited as a fraud. Talk about supporting a false news narrative.

Go Mr. Robb, Go - support "fake news".

11. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 4:23:56 PM)
     Message ID #296087

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296086 )  Back To All Messages

Thanks for making my point. The Repubs have made a cottage industry out of discrediting it, but no one has seen it or heard the testimony on how it was developed except for Congressional Committees. If it was not credible that fact would have been leaked long ago, but there have been no leaks. Why? Because the information compiled in it is credible.

12. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 8:09:19 PM)
     Message ID #296089

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296087 )  Back To All Messages

Are you really this dense?

It has been debunked several times over.

You need to get more honest handlers.

13. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 8:01:11 PM)
     Message ID #296090

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296089 )  Back To All Messages

Bs, post some links. You really should confine yourself to emojis. As I said, it could be more interesting, and more damning than Bannon's book.

14. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 6:56:19 PM)
     Message ID #296091

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296090 )  Back To All Messages

Prove it is credible JA.

15. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 4:46:18 PM)
     Message ID #296093

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296091 )  Back To All Messages

Dummy, releasing it will give everyone an opportunity to evaluate its credibility. You stated that it has been debunked multiple times, but you can't come up with ONE credible source proving your point. I never said it was credible. Since I have never seen it, I have no way to decide. Neither have you, but you are mouthing trump's fake news that it is not credible.
Stick to emojis. Every time you post something else you make a fool of yourself.

16. Rick T CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 4:44:49 PM)
     Message ID #296100

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296089 )  Back To All Messages

Youíre lying M. Itís been smeared and mischaracterized by republican operatives but not debunked. You need better propaganda.

17. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 4:39:48 PM)
     Message ID #296106

This message is in response to Rick T ( message id #296100 )  Back To All Messages

Stay away from the weed; it just makes you look ......

Debunked. Many of the events alleged in the dossier never happened.

18. Rick T CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/4/2018 8:01:50 AM)
     Message ID #296110

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296106 )  Back To All Messages

What dossier are you talking about, Steele's? Some things in the Steele dossier corroborated what the F.B.I. knew from other sources. Steele's dossier is a small part of what Fusion GPS found.

Fusion GPS wants the 10 hour transcript released by congress but, Senator (snake in the) Grassley and the republicans refuse. Release the transcript.

19. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 6:58:01 PM)
     Message ID #296108

This message is in response to Rick T ( message id #296100 )  Back To All Messages

Of course he is lying. He has nothing credible to support his claim. GPS Fusion wants their testimony released because the dossier was put together with credible sources.

20. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 5:00:57 PM)
     Message ID #296111

This message is in response to Rick T ( message id #296100 )  Back To All Messages

Obviously, if the Repubs could debunk the dossier they would release it and debunk it, but they can't debunk it, and they have ever reason to believe it is factual, so they won't release it.

21. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/4/2018 8:04:26 AM)
     Message ID #296102

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296078 )  Back To All Messages

You should contact your "source" and explain usurping a Presidents' Executive powers is unconstitutional.

If Mueller has indeed been doing that, he is in a world of trouble. Recheck your sources.

22. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 7:02:07 PM)
     Message ID #296103

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296102 )  Back To All Messages

Your post makes no sense.

23. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 5:05:12 PM)
     Message ID #296104

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296102 )  Back To All Messages

If, in the course of his investigations, Mueller comes across evidence of crimes that should be prosecuted by a state rather than the Special Counsel he passes the evidence on to the state. The fact that the little hands guy cannot pardon state criminal acts is added insurance that the bone spur guy will not further obstruct justice anymore than he already has.

24. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 5:06:40 PM)
     Message ID #296122

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296104 )  Back To All Messages

How do you know that?

Why is the Federal Government spending millions to pursue "State" crimes? Does Mueller have access to a Federal Grand Jury?

More word salad.

25. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 7:08:24 PM)
     Message ID #296124

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296122 )  Back To All Messages

You do have a comprehension problem. Go back and read my post. Mueller is a diligent public servant. When he discovers crimes against states he shares the information. The fact that it provides him additional leverage against witnesses because the dim don cannot protect them from prosecution is just an added benefit.

26. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 5:11:26 PM)
     Message ID #296079

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296076 )  Back To All Messages

He likely does not have a case. Hard to develop an case for essentially malicious prosecution. However, it will create a problem for Mueller for a bit of time.

And, is great for the laugh factor.

The interesting event is going be how DOJ/FBI deal with the evidence coming out of the Congressional and IG investigations. The initial indication is trouble is going to be brewing for some folks closely associated with Big Ears and Orange Pantsuit; real crimes; not process crimes.

Personally, I think it is time for Sessions to go. The support for him to recuse himself was extremely weak. Rosenstein is simply a stalking horse for the Left (I know registered Republican - but, still gave Mueller too broad of a scope for the investigation - if Mueller had simply chased the issue - collusion - this donkey show would be over).

27. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 9:48:16 PM)
     Message ID #296081

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296079 )  Back To All Messages

If he can get a Judge to review the Special Prosecutors' Law, it mucks up the whole thing.

Yah, Sessions is a basset hound when you need a pit bull.

28. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 8:51:27 PM)
     Message ID #296082

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296081 )  Back To All Messages

Maybe; but the jurisdiction is going to create a problem for his case.

Again, I like the fact it creates a distraction for Mueller and will likely embarrass the DOJ.

29. Tams Bixby CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 8:44:20 PM)
     Message ID #296084

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296081 )  Back To All Messages

Sessions is more like a toy poodle ... All Yap and No Crap.

30. D Robb
     (1/3/2018 5:22:30 PM)
     Message ID #296097

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #296081 )  Back To All Messages

Think Montafort's suit mucks everything up as much as Bannon's book? The mid-terms are becoming a referendum on trump.

31. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 9:31:52 PM)
     Message ID #296098

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #296097 )  Back To All Messages

So, you support lies, if they support your position(s) and/or goal(s).

You have spent months telling everyone how "wrong" and "evil" Mr. Bannon was; now, he is your new religion.

Got it.

32. Domenick Aulozzi CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 5:28:09 PM)
     Message ID #296099

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296098 )  Back To All Messages

This should be very interesting M to watch the left now embrace someone they have consistently derided as a lying scum bag. Now that he is talking against their worst nightmare, it seems to have changed their mind about Bannon. I'd love to hear from Patricia on this matter.
  1-32 of 32