CEOExpress Blogger Private Label
 CEOExpress Home


 Total visits to this poll: 14774

This icon appears on your homepage
when there are new posts.

      Search Messages:           
 
AllThis Forum

Do you think it's more effective to be for or against something or someone?

For
Against
Something else what?



Forum View Preference: Basic | AdvancedOpen Forums/Previous Polls | Suggest a Poll
See All Messages

1-7 of 7

1. D Robb
     (1/1/2018 12:18:26 PM)
     Message ID #295937

Back To All Messages
Does taunting Iran about their internal protests make the situation better or worse?

2. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/1/2018 2:10:28 PM)
     Message ID #295941

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #295937 )  Back To All Messages

The evasive and subtle comments made by the last President under the same situation in June 2009, changed nothing.

But, back then we were afraid of a leading the world in condemnations and hoping appeasement would bring them around.

That failed.

3. D Robb
     (1/1/2018 3:29:05 PM)
     Message ID #295943

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #295941 )  Back To All Messages

President Obama was accused of leading from the rear because he wished to stop sending US troops off to fight useless battles. trump is not leading at all. He has withdrawn the US from international agreements and is actively kissing up to our enemy, Putin.
conducting tweeter wars is not a replacement for serious diplomacy.

4. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/1/2018 5:07:36 PM)
     Message ID #295948

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #295943 )  Back To All Messages

Or making a deal with Rouhani to look the other way and not pursue Hezbollah smuggling drugs into the US?

Apparently the DEA was pursuing a huge case of money laundering/drug smuggling, funds that were used to kill Americans.

You want to make an Arms Treaty? Bring it to Congress.

5. D Robb
     (1/1/2018 5:49:37 PM)
     Message ID #295952

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #295948 )  Back To All Messages

You are attempting to glue together separate issues. The Iran Nuclear deal has been successful. Destroying it will only create a bigger, richer, more dangerous N Korea. Do you want that?
We can continue working with ME nations to find a way to restabilize it. Bush's invasion of Iraq destroyed the balance and empowered Iran, led to the rise of ISIS, and the present mess.
Attacking Iran with tweeter taunts does nothing to make the situation better, it makes it worse because it shows how few real options the US has.

6. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/2/2018 7:36:02 AM)
     Message ID #295968

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #295952 )  Back To All Messages

How can that be successful?

The clock is ticking, what are down to? Seven years? And where do you think they got that technology?

7. D Robb
     (1/2/2018 10:58:30 AM)
     Message ID #295976

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #295968 )  Back To All Messages

Thomas, weren't you the guy who tried to portray himself as a cool, logical, unemotional decision maker? Yet, your post is all emotion, and no facts.
FACT: Every nation that negotiated the Iran Nuclear treaty, including the US, certified that Iran is complying with the treaty. I think that is the very definition of success.
FACT: Nations seek nuclear weapons because they feel threatened, and they know that there has never been a war between two nuclear-armed nations. Therefore, threatening nations that feel threatened is counterproductive, yet that is what the little handed tweetster does everyday. Counterproductive.
  1-7 of 7