CEOExpress Blogger Private Label
 CEOExpress Home

 Total visits to this poll: 14940

This icon appears on your homepage
when there are new posts.

      Search Messages:           
AllThis Forum

Do you think it's more effective to be for or against something or someone?

Something else what?

Forum View Preference: Basic | AdvancedOpen Forums/Previous Polls | Suggest a Poll
See All Messages

1-2 of 2

1. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (12/30/2017 1:10:21 PM)
     Message ID #295871

This message is in response to Noel Meyer ( message id #295865 )  Back To All Messages

your or you're?

All emotional rants M.

It's all business....not personal, need to know and separate the difference.

It's like the first car you bought, that was all love. The last car you bought was all logic.

2. Noel Meyer
     (12/30/2017 6:47:30 PM)
     Message ID #295897

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #295871 )  Back To All Messages

"It's all business....not personal, need to know and separate the difference."

1. Republican position on Hillary Clinton?
a. Personal, personal hatred not of her skills or experience but of her personally
b. Republican position of "lock her up" during the campaign was totally emotional since neither the Republicans nor the FBI found her guilty of anything.

2. Roy Moore's campaign in Alabama?
a. Reaction to a pedophile for the US Senate was emotional, not business

3. Republican tax bill, Republican repeal and replace (NOT) of Obama-care, Trump Muslim bans, all forms of PERSONAL Republican legislation to their deplorable base.

4. DACA, CHIP, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security all are being handled as Republican emotional responses to the extremes of the base not as 'business' decisions, not as issues for the good of the nation.

5. The party of not just "NO", but of "HELL NO" flew against all logic and common sense--
a. The closing down of the government by the Tea Party
b. Making Obama a 'one term president'
c. Failing an up or down vote on Obama's Supreme Court nominee

6. Someone mentioned "Consistency" in positions, well, serial murderers are consistent, still does not make them good or right. In fact, its the very definition of being for or against things in ALWAYS being for some things and against other things (like always for defense or always against social programs, like being for tax cuts for the wealthy and obfuscation for the middle class)

7. Do you think it's more effective to be for or against something or someone?
Republicans have for eight years been the party of "NO" and now only now want Democrat help to spend money running up the debt. Democrats have learned from the Republicans for all those years the power of just saying NO.

8. This forum question is not about compromise, its an opportunity to defend a pessimistic view of being against something or an optimistic view of being for something. What I marveled at was how the usual suspects seem to avoid defending their personal attacks against who is posting instead of promoting their views and their values and their logic (NOT).
  1-2 of 2