CEOExpress Blogger Private Label
 CEOExpress Home

 Total visits to this poll: 15199

This icon appears on your homepage
when there are new posts.

      Search Messages:           
AllThis Forum

Do you think it's more effective to be for or against something or someone?

Something else what?

Forum View Preference: Basic | AdvancedOpen Forums/Previous Polls | Suggest a Poll
See All Messages

1-2 of 2

1. Tams Bixby CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/3/2018 1:50:00 PM)
     Message ID #296065

This message is in response to M Bathurst ( message id #296063 )  Back To All Messages

"I also find it interesting that Mr. Bixby stated in an earlier post that Pres. Trump is doing many of the things he thinks should be done; but, that he is the wrong person to do it. WTF. If Big Ears had done some of these things I would have been congratulating him for doing the right thing. He goes on to say, Pres. Trump is simply unqualified to be President. And, Big Ears was? Look at the backgrounds of both gentlemen. Pres. Trump was not my first choice. However, he clearly was the only person could have beat Ms. Orange Jumpsuit and do what is being done. So, if he is here for 4 years or 8 years; I don't care. He will make some mistakes; but, he will be the reason many more serious mistakes were not made by the Progressives.

PS: You are being very nice to Mr. Bixby. I think he likes dancing in Robb's World.


Point #1: I can't count the number of times (too many to count) I've said I didn't support BHO either and if you've read my previous posts in previous topics as closely as you claim to have read my previous posts on this topic, then you already know the truth of what I say - so you're pushing close to getting a real earful by claiming or inferring I support BHO.

Point #2: The same can and has been said by me about "dancing TO anyone's song or IN anyone's world" and again, if you've read my posts as closely as you claim, you know this to be true as well.

Further than what I've said here I won't go because your claims are unsubstantiated and unworthy of more response.

2. M Bathurst
     (1/3/2018 1:52:18 PM)
     Message ID #296066

This message is in response to Tams Bixby ( message id #296065 )  Back To All Messages

  1-2 of 2