Help
CEOExpress Home | News Center | Contact Us
  McKinsey Quarterly

 
Industries
Automotive
Energy, Resources, Materials
Financial Services
Food & Agriculture
Health Care
High Tech
Media & Entertainment
Nonprofit
Public Sector
Retail
Telecommunications
Transportation
Function
Corporate Finance
Economic Studies
Governance
Information Technology
Marketing
Operations
Organization
Strategy
Search Articles:

All of these words Any of these words
Summary
Please note: The McKinsey Quarterly has agreed to a special arrangement for CEOExpress members that allows member access to their articles. Articles must be clicked on directly through the links below to gain access to this group of articles.
Bringing discipline to strategy
How do traditional models for developing corporate strategy hold up in the face of rapidly changing markets, conflicting information, and shifting business relationships? Often, not very well. Yet up to half of an executive's strategic decisions must be made under such conditions. A broader view of strategy can help executives cope with ambiguity and change. By matching corporate strategy to the level of uncertainty, understanding the sources of competitive advantage, and building on a series of large and small bets and strategic options, companies can tailor more effective strategies, with less risk of being locked into one position when conditions change.

The take-away: Traditionally, strategic management has meant little more than staying the course. Yet no single strategic conception can be deployed in all circumstances. Instead, executives must understand many models of strategic development and question the way strategy is developed—and by whom.
  


Articles provided by The McKinsey Quarterly
© 1992-2003 McKinsey & Company, Inc

 

Copyright ©1999-2024 CEOExpress Company LLC.