CEOExpress Blogger Private Label
 CEOExpress Home


 Total visits to this poll: 14990

This icon appears on your homepage
when there are new posts.

      Search Messages:           
 
AllThis Forum

Do you think it's more effective to be for or against something or someone?

For
Against
Something else what?



Forum View Preference: Basic | AdvancedOpen Forums/Previous Polls | Suggest a Poll
See All Messages

1-2 of 2

1. D Robb
     (1/1/2018 5:45:25 PM)
     Message ID #295951

This message is in response to Thomas C ( message id #295947 )  Back To All Messages

No you ignore users and concentrate on providing them the medical services to quit their habits. You provide drugs and needles if they won't. You continue to prosecute those dealing with drugs, but, eventually, their market will dry up if addicts can get clean, safe drugs legally, and their money and power to corrupt will dry up as well.
It's clear the War on Drugs has been a failure, and nobody expects it to be successful anytime in the future.

2. Thomas C CEOExpressSelect Member
     (1/2/2018 7:32:16 AM)
     Message ID #295966

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #295951 )  Back To All Messages

Interesting read in NYT from addicts viewpoint, rehabs gone wild.

Despite '08 change in law to include addiction in mental health benefits, and further reinforcement by Obamacare, addition deaths are at an all time high.

Prescribed pain killers flow freely from providers, as a less expensive alternative illicit drugs such as heroin, fentanyl, and meth flow freely across the border, and they are affordable, even for a non-functioning addict. There are miles and miles of small town border crossing not far from where you live, locals freely pass daily, it's simply 'business"

The real bulk crosses the Mexican border

It is now the leading cause of accidental death in the US. Mostly male under the age of 35.

"Treatment" will not curtail the demand. Cutting the supply will as the price goes up.
  1-2 of 2