|
The Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration in a major blow to the rights of immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers. The court ruled 6 to 3 along partisan lines to sanction so-called metering at the southern border, which allows immigration officers at ports of entry to block asylum seekers from setting foot on U.S. soil.
"In a time of increasing conflict and climate catastrophe, this will result in many more deaths," warns Erika Pinheiro of Al Otro Lado, the lead plaintiff in the case. When the turnback policy was first introduced, recounts Melissa Crow of the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, who served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs' case, many asylum seekers became "so desperate that they ended up trying to enter between ports of entry, either by swimming across the Rio Grande or by traversing the desert under harrowing conditions, and many, many of them didn't make it to the other side."
|
|
(First column, 3rd story, link)
Related stories:
SPRAY AWAY: Court Rejects Lawsuit Alleging ROUNDUP Weedkiller Caused Cancer...
Drudge Report Feed needs your support! Become a Patron
|
|
(Third column, 10th story, link)
Related stories:
ROYALS REVEAL FINANCES...
Drudge Report Feed needs your support! Become a Patron
|
|
(Second column, 6th story, link)
Related stories:
The Night Ground Wouldn't Stop Shaking...
Drudge Report Feed needs your support! Become a Patron
|
|
The court handed President Trump victories in his push to rescind deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of people and turn away migrants at the southern border.
|
|
The ruling rejected the Trump administration's attempt to change federal election procedures through an executive order.
|
|
The 6-3 decision clears the way for the Trump administration to resume allowing federal agents at the border to turn back asylum seekers before they enter.
|
RELATED ARTICLES | | |
|
