|
The majority said the law was a victim of its own success and no longer needed. Dissenters responded that Congress should make the call.
|
RELATED ARTICLES | | |
|
What a weakened Voting Rights Act means in today's America AxiosTakeaways from the Supreme Court's historic Voting Rights Act opinion and what's next for the midterms CNNSupreme Court paves the way for largest-ever drop in Black representation in Congress NPRLouisiana governor prepares to suspend House primaries after court ruling The Washington PostIn Blow to Voting Rights Act, Supreme Court Embraces Claim of Racial Progress The New
|
|
Louisiana governor prepares to suspend House primaries after court ruling The Washington PostLive Updates: Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana Map in Voting Rights Case The New York TimesBlackburn pitches 9-0 GOP map for Tennessee after Supreme Court decision AxiosWhat the Supreme Court's ruling on race and redistricting means for 2026 elections — and beyond NBC NewsVoters Ca
|
|
The court struck down the voting map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander in a move that could make it harder for lawmakers to create majority-minority voting districts.
|
|
The Supreme Court retreats from 1986 rules that called for electing Blacks and Latinos to Congress and state and local boards.
|
|
