|
(First column, 8th story, link)
Related stories:
MAG: The Arch Is Atrocious...
See inside...
America's 250th birthday increasingly centers on The Don...
Revolutionary War villain being rehabilitated in time for celebration...
|
|
(Second column, 4th story, link)
Related stories:
SPACEX targets $135 IPO price at valuation of $1.77 trillion...
POISED TO ENRICH WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS WHO HOLD MILLIONS IN STOCK...
MUSK EXPECTED TO BECOME WORLD'S FIRST TRILLIONAIRE...
'I rode Elon's Vegas Loop, the worst transit system on Earth'...
Drudge Report Feed needs your support! Become a Patron
|
|
It's "a legal absurdity," said one expert.
|
|
(First column, 15th story, link)
Related stories:
MAG: The Arch Is Atrocious...
See inside...
Immunity Deal Stinks Even More Than Blatantly Corrupt 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'...
Revolutionary War villain being rehabilitated in time for celebration...
|
|
In an emergency ruling on Tuesday night, the court's conservative majority gave a first glimpse into congressional district battles under a weakened Voting Rights Act.
|
|
The order is a response to resistance during the first Trump administration, when senior career government officials routinely pushed back against policies that appeared to exceed legal boundaries.
|
|
After widespread bipartisan outcry, the Justice Department says it is permanently abandoning plans for a $1.776 billion "anti-weaponization" fund. Widely branded as a "slush fund," it was expected to reward President Donald Trump's supporters, including those who attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The fund was announced in May as part of a settlement in Trump's personal lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax data. That case was recently reopened, after dozens of former federal judges filed a motion alleging that Trump's actions were "collusive." As Nancy Gertner, one of the judges who joined the motion, explains, "What happened in this case was, essentially, Trump was suing himself. There was no question that Trump was on both sides of the 'v.'" Gertner and her fellow judges are represented by attorney Matt Platkin, who says, "It is illegal for the president to ask for any IRS audit to be opened or closed. That is a federal crime."
|
|
