|
Fed nominee Warsh prepares for monetary policy road test before Senate panel ReutersFed Chair nominee Warsh says monetary policy must remain independent, but Fed must 'stay in its lane' CNBCNext Catalyst for Treasury Bonds Is Named Kevin Warsh BloombergThe Problem With Kevin Warsh Isn't His Wealth, It's His Wealth Forbes
|
|
iPhone 18 Pro Launching in September With These 10 New Features MacRumorsExclusive look at Dark Cherry and the rest of the iPhone 18 Pro colors MacworldLatest iPhone rumors: iPhone 18 colors and cameras appear in new leaks MashableApple iPhone 18 Pro Latest Leak Signals Significant Design Change ForbesThese are rumored to be the four iPhone 18 Pro colors AppleInsider
|
|
Topic: New DemocracyPoliticsThe more extreme Trump gets, the more the non-MAGA Republicans, whom I will call the "GOP," would like to be free of him. They always distrusted him, but their desire for power overwhelmed that distrust. The alternative to Trump was the Democrats. Opposition to Trump meant being pushed out of the Republican party like Liz Cheney. Now they live in fear. Only the GOP have the political power to remove Trump. 4 in the House. 4 in the Senate could pass a resolution, including a resolution declaring Trump an insurrectionist. 14 could beat filibuster, 20 could pass veto-proof resolutions or convict an impeachment.
But to "shoot at the king and miss" means the end of their career; all they have worked for. Is there a way the Democrats could help them and save the country, as is their duty?
Trump's threat is this: defy him, and next primary, they'll run a MAGA opponent. Elon Musk will fund that campaign. You'll be out, even in a safe seat.
The Democrats could pledge this: If you are in a safe GOP seat and you vote to be rid of Trump, and they attack you, we won't run anybody in your race. Further, we'll tell our supporters to register as Republicans and vote for you, and if that fails, you can run as an independent, or even a new party called the "Grand Old" party, and we'll tell our supporters to vote for you. One time only, but we'll do what we can, and you'll get 6 more years. It had better be over after that.
This actually costs
|
|
 Alexandra Readhead investigates whether IMF and OECD proposals on how to tax the digital economy, apply formulary apportionment, shift taxing rights and address profit shifting could apply to the natural resources sector. Alternatively, could source-based taxation improvements hold the answer?
|
|
