|
Time's 2025 Person of the Year: The architects of AI YahooThe Architects of AI Are TIME's 2025 Person of the Year Time MagazineTime magazine to name its person of the year for 2025 AP NewsWill Trump be named Time Person of the Year again? Here are the odds USA TodayTime unveils its person of the year and it's the driving force looking to replace humans The Independent
|
|
28 Years Later III is definitely happening — and Cillian Murphy is already in talks to return empireonline.com‘28 Years Later III' Moving Forward At Sony With Cillian Murphy In Talks; Alex Garland Penning DeadlineThird "28 Years Later" Gets The Go Ahead Dark Horizons28 Years Later III fate revealed after first reactions to sequel The Bone Temple The Independent
|
RELATED ARTICLES | | |
|
At this year's DealBook Summit, there was an understanding that in the Trump era, business runs through the White house like never before.
|
|
A 50-year mortgage is a poor solution to America's housing crisis. What's needed are more homes.
|
|
Three members of the Federal Open Market Committee didn't agree with the central bank's quarter percentage point cut on Wednesday.
|
RELATED ARTICLES | | |
|
First work for the multilevel marketing cosmetics and skincare brand is expected early next year
|
|
Main image:
WHAT are Republican lawmakers in politics to achieve? Not many years ago, at the peak of their outrage over Barack Obama''s economic stimulus package, 'balanced budgets' might have featured in the answer. But the frenzied passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through Congress has revealed the insincerity of the party''s fiscal moralising. Republicans in Congress do not oppose government borrowing when it suits them. Rather, the overarching policy objective that unifies them is cutting taxes—and damn the fiscal consequences. Following the passage of the tax bill through the Senate in the early hours of December 2nd, Republicans are on the brink of achieving their goal.On November 30th budget scorekeepers unveiled a forecast for how much extra economic growth the tax bill might spark: enough to pay for about one third of its $1.5trn cost. Previously, Republicans might have viewed this projection as a triumph. They have long pressed for budget forecasts to include such 'dynamic' effects (see blog). But the score briefly seemed to imperil the bill. It undermined the absurd claim, made by the Republican leadership and the Trump administration, that tax cuts would pay for themselves in full. No serious economist ever thought this credible. Yet the official score seemed to blow Republicans'' ...
|
|
